Environmental scanning is a concept that has emerged from strategic
planning literature. Aguilar (1967), pioneer in development of the concept, used
the environmental scanning to denote the systematic collection of information
external to an organization. Its two purposes are: to organize the information
flowing into an organization and to provide the organization with early warnings
of changing environmental conditions that could impact the organization .
An Early Warning System
That environmental scanning is an ''early warning" process for
organizations is emphasized by Brown and Weiner (1985) who define
environmental scanning as a "kind of radar" for organizations. According to them,
environmental scanning helps to detect new and changing conditions.
Environmental Scanning and Strategic Planning
Morrison's (1987, 1985) work has been a key to translating and applying
the concepts of strategic planning and the process of environmental scanning to
higher education. He defines environmental scanning as a "...structure to identify
and evaluate trends, events, and emerging issues of import to the institution.''
Stoffels (1988) adds a dynamic quality to the concept by noting that
"Environmental scanning is a methodology for coping with external social,
economic and technical issues that may be difficult to observe or predict but that
cannot be ignored and will not go away . . ."
The strategic and futuristic aspects of environmental scanning are
captured by Hayden (1986). She defines environmental scanning as "analyzing
trends in those external factors that affect a company's performance in order to
make ASSUMPTIONS and FORECASTS about the future." Results of the
environmental scanning process i.e., collecting information from a variety of
sources focusing on trends, events, and issues that could impact an organization
typically result in the building of "scenarios." These stories pose alternative
futures for the organization based on assumptions and forecasts generated by the environmental scanning process (Bryson, 1988). By exploring key concepts of environmental scanning, the potential usefulness of the process for college and university campuses becomes apparent.
Key Concepts of Environmental Scanning
The key concepts of environmental scanning can be highlighted by asking
the following questions: What information do you scan? What methods are
available? How can the scanning process be organized and used?
Answering these questions from a college and university housing
perspective will not only allow for the presentation of the concepts, hut also show
their applicability to the campus environment.
What information do you scan?
Determining what information to scan is an extremely important process.
You scan information sources related to the mission of the organization: the
purpose and goals of the organization indicate where to look for information.
Then, once the sources have been identified. the question focuses on what types
of information are important .
Morrison's (1987) classification scheme is helpful in answering questions
concerning types of information. He suggests that the scanner look for trends,
events, and emerging issues. A trend is a series of social, technological economic,
or political characteristics that can be measured or estimated over time. colleges
and universities might be interested in the number of high school graduates who
attend college from the institution's various regional recruitment areas. An event
is defined as a discrete, confirmable occurrence which makes the future different
from the past. The building of a new 2-year institution near the campus, or a
major change in state policy regarding student financial aid could be such an
event. Morrisonss emerging issue refers to a potential controversy arising out of a
trend or event and which may require a response. Concern over increased campus
racial incidents is an example of an emerging issue.
What methods are available?
Stoffels (1988) suggests four different scanning methods. First, scanning
can be implemented at an informal observational level. At this level a scanner
would at a very informal level be alert to information about the external
environment that might have an impact on the housing organization. This
information might be obtained from a conference or an item in a journal or
newspaper related to higher education.
At a second level, conditioned observation, a scanner might begin to seek
further information regarding an issue that emerged during the informal scanning
process. For example, the informal observation may turn up the trend that more
and more young people attending colleges and universities are seeking a full
range of on campus recreational opportunities. The scanner might wish to pursue
other sources of information that would confirm or fail to confirm the trend. If
confirmed and if the probability appeared high that this trend might impact the
campus, then a third level of scanning might be undertaken: informal search.
At the level of informal search, the scanner seeks specific information
related to the trend. The following questions might be a part of an informal
search. Are these potential students seeking indoor or outdoor recreational
opportunity. Are they looking for "open play" or "organized play."
Finally Stoffels suggests the formal search. This calls for establishing a
formal search methodology focused at specific information. A designated staff
member or a special committee is given a search assignment and an appropriate
budget. For example, a scanning committee could design a methodology to tap
several national databases relevant to the issue.
How Do You Organize and Use the Scanning Process?
Environmental scanning systems range from simple to very complex. A
beginning system for a university could be as simple as assigning several staff
members in a planning office to review and abstract information from journals,
magazines, and newsletters focusing on college student issues. Information
generated by the scanners may be shared in staff meetings or campus newsletters.
The sharing and discussing of the information may lead to change in
organizational policy.
A more complex scanning system might include a network of scanners
each performing informal as well as directed scanning in areas dictated by
specific goals and objectives of a mission statement. Information from various
sources may be sent to organizational committees to review potential impact on
the organization. This scanning information can be used to build a series of
scenarios for discussion and consideration. The information flow within this more
complex structure can be accomplished by a series of hard copy forms or a more
innovative system involving an interactive database. Scanners in the organization
can input data regarding trends, events, and emerging issues; other members of
the process can add information and implications for the organization campus
managers can access the system to obtain information and to ask additional
questions of the scanners. Whatever form the environmental scanning
organization takes, the final important task is to provide information to facilitate
strategic decisions of the organization (Stoffels, 1988).
(References can be found on back page: Resource References: Environmental
Scanning)
Stage One: (Steps one and two of the ecosystem design process)
Stage Two: (Steps five and six of the ecosystem design process)
Stage Three: (Step seven in the ecosystem design process)
Stage Four: (Step three and four of the ecosystem design process)
As residence halls open each fall, housing directors across the nation are
often faced with at least a temporary housing crunch. Due to overbooking to
protect the budget from ''no shows'' and/or the unexpected late admitted students,
there is often a scramble to find temporary measures to accommodate everyone.
One of the most common strategies is to "triple" double rooms.
Research suggests, however, this may not be the wisest strategy. Aiello,
Baum, and Cormley (1981) found that three persons in a room compared to two
persons in a room experience more crowding, social tension, and negative
feelings. Another study (Baron, Mandel, Adams and Griffen, 1976) found the
more dense arrangement produced the perception of crowding, less feeling of
being in control and more negative feelings toward others as well as the room
itself.
But there is more to crowding than the number of persons to a room.
Baum, Shapiro, Murry, and Wideman (1979) found in their work that crowded
triple rooms produced coalitions between two of the three residents. The isolated
student appears to bear the burden of the stress. Rooms, however, with four
residents typically do not experience the "isolate" phenomena. Under the four
person arrangement, there were less control problems and less experience of
crowding (Reddy, Baum, Fleming, and Aiello, 1981).
References:
Aiello, J., Baum, A. & Gormley, F. (1981). Social determinants of residential
crowding stress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 643-649.
Baron, R., Mandel, D., Adams, C. & Griffen, L.. (1976). Effects of social density
in university residential environments. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 34, 434-446.
Baum, A., Shapiro, A., Murray, D., & Wideman, M. (1979). Interpersonal
mediation of perceived crowding and control in residential dyads and triads.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 491-507.
Reddy, D., Baum, A., Fleming, R., & Aiello, J. (1981). Mediation of social
density by coalition formation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11,
529-537.
Blake, R. & Mouton, J. (1982). Theory and research for developing a science of
leadership. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3). 275-291.
Burns, James M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Gray, Elizabeth D. (1982). Patriarchy as a conceptual trap. Wellesley, MA:
Roundtable Press.
Holahan, C., Wilcox, B., Spearly, J. & Campbell, M. (1979). The ecological
perspective in community mental health. Community Mental Health Review, 4,
2-9.
King, Y. (1989). The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology. In Judith
Plant, (Ed). Healing the wounds. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers
Kohn, A. (1986). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin Company
Kokopeli,B. & Lakey, L. (no date). Leadership for change. Toward a feminist
model. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education.
Saskin, M. (1984). Participative management is an ethical imperative.
Organizational Dynamics, 12, 4-22.
Schaef, Ann W. (1985). Women's reality: An emerging female system in a white
male society. San Franscisco: Harper and Row, Publishers.
Solomon, K. & Levy, N. (1982) (Eds.) Men in transition: Theory and therapy.
New York: Plenum Press.
Spretnak, C. (1987). Ecofeminism: Our roots and flowering. Women of Power, 9,
6-10.
Wortman, M. (1982). Strategic management and changing leader-follower roles. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(5), 571-585.
Aguilar, F.J. (1967). Scanning the business environment. New York: Macmillian.
Brown, A., & Weiner, E. (1985). Supermanaging: How to harness change for
personal and organizational success. New York: Mentor.
Bryson, J . (1988). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hayden, C. (1986). The handbook of strategic expertise. New York: The Free
Press.
Morrison, J. (1987). Establishing an environmental scanning/ forecasting system to augment college and university planning. Planning, 15(1), 7-22.
Morrison, J. (1985). Establishing an environmental scanning process. In R. Davis
(Ed.). Leadership and institutional renewal. New Directions for Higher Education.
No. 49. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Renfro W., and Morrison, J. (1984). Detecting signals of change. The Futurist,
Aug., 49-53.
Stoffels, J. (1988). Environmental scanning for future success. Managerial Planning, Nov.-Dec., 4-12.
This material resides on an Indiana State University server and is maintained by
Will Barratt.
Please forward any problems and comments to him.